Physicians and Futile Care: Using Ethics Committees to Slow the Momentum
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law, Medicine and Health Care
- Vol. 20 (4), 336-339
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01214.x
Abstract
The subject of physician efforts to limit care by unilaterally withholding particular therapies, even if the patient, or the family of an incompetent patient, wishes continued care, plays an increasingly prominent role in discussions of clinical medical ethics. Some providers have described a professional duty to define the futility of care, and to act on the determination of futility even in the face of the patient’s, or a surrogate’s, resistance. This aggressive stance has gained intellectual momentum and may be percolating down into clinical practice. Given the history of the medical profession's diffident attitude toward patients’ rights and its reliance on well-meaning paternalism, the notion that doctors should determine futility and limit access to specific interventions must be carefully scrutinized. Indeed, the emergence of two other themes in health policy and ethics, in particular the living will/power of attorney initiative on the one hand and the open discussion of rationing care in Oregon on the other, tends to undermine the key rationales for physician control over futile care.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Informed Demand for “Non-Beneficial” Medical TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The Case of Helga WanglieNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The Health Care Proxy and the Living WillNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Breaking American Health Policy GridlockHealth Affairs, 1991
- Physicians' Refusal of Requested TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Who Defines Futility?JAMA, 1988
- Must We Always Use CPR?New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Behind Closed DoorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Choices about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984