Preference for Signal-Shock vs Shock-Signal
- 1 December 1963
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 13 (3), 735-738
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1963.13.3.735
Abstract
Sixteen rats were run in a tilt box for 11 hr. on each of three successive days, and then three more days with conditions reversed. On one side, Ss received 3 sec. light followed immediately by .5 sec. shock. On the other side, they received the same stimuli in reverse order. Six shocks were presented each half hour regardless of Ss' behavior. A reliable preference for signal-shock was acquired during pre-reversal training. There was some tendency for Ss to shift their preference to the new signal-shock side during reversal, but this did not differ reliably from chance at the end of the reversal training. The results are interpreted as supporting a preparatory response interpretation of classical conditioning and of the acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choice of a warning signal or no warning signal in an unavoidable shock situation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963
- A time variable in the acquisition of observing responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960
- Immediate vs. delayed shock in T-maze performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956
- The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses.Psychological Review, 1955
- The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part I.Psychological Review, 1952