Choosing between apples and apples

Abstract

Objective:To examine physician choices of commonly used medications having similar side effects and efficacies, and to evaluate factors that may affect these choices. Design/setting:Cross-sectional survey conducted in winter 1989–1990. Participants:263 physicians at a university teaching hospital (response rate=71%). Measurements and main results:Physicians rated patient compliance, cost to patient, and patient preference as the three most influential factors in their selection of a particular agent from a class of similar drugs. Housestaff were less likely than faculty to consider cost to patient as a “very important” factor (33% vs. 60%; p ₂)blockers, and inhaled beta-agonists were mainly determined by which drugs enhanced compliance or were used by others (the “traditional choice”); cost to patient was a less important influence in these instances. All physician subgroups were inaccurate in predicting the approximate prices of their first- and second-choice agents. For example, only 28% of those selecting naproxen as their preferred NSAID were within $10 of the range of the prices of a one-month supply, and 14% were within $10 for cimetidine. Conclusion:Although this group of physicians reported considering drug costs to be important when choosing between similar drugs, they acknowledged that cost was relatively unimportant in several specific instances studied and their knowledge of the absolute and relative prices of drugs they commonly prescribed was deficient.