A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires
Open Access
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Research
- Vol. 20 (1), 36-44
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378302000105
Abstract
A comprehensive literature review of techniques used to increase response rates to questionnaires was conducted. Conclusions were based on arithmetic combination of 497 response rates found in 93 journal articles. Response rates were found to be increased by personal and telephone (versus mail) surveys, either prepaid or promised incentives, nonmonetary premiums and rewards, and increasing amounts of monetary reward. Other facilitators that increased responding were preliminary notification, foot-in-the-door techniques, personalization, and followup letters. Several facilitators were found to be ineffective. An estimated magnitude of effect was calculated for each design variation.Keywords
This publication has 106 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Monetary Incentives in National Assessment Household SurveysJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978
- Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- The Effect On Return Rate of Messages Explaining Monetary Incentives in Mail Questionnaire StudiesInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1976
- An experimental investigation of mail-survey responsesJournal of Business Research, 1975
- Personalizing Mail Surveys: A Replication and ReassessmentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1974
- Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response in Large Samples of the General PublicPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1972
- Anonymous versus identifiable questionnaires in drug usage surveys.American Psychologist, 1970
- Questionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological AnalysisSocial Forces, 1969
- A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from HouseholdsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967
- Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966