A questionnaire‐based outcome analysis of the Stamey bladder neck suspension procedure for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: the Hannover experience

Abstract

To evaluate the long-term continence rate, including subjective satisfaction and therapy-associated morbidity, of patients undergoing Stamey bladder neck suspension. Eighty-five women (median age 55 years, range 30–85) with urinary stress incontinence treated by Stamey bladder neck suspension at our institution between 1987 and 1995 were evaluated using an anonymous questionnaire over a mean (range) follow-up of 61 (13–93) months. Of the 85 patients, 44 (52%) reported an improvement in clinical symptoms at the evaluation and 29 (34%) were completely continent after the Stamey procedure. However, 53 (62%) patients reported subjective satisfaction with the result, because they had a durable improvement in continence for a mean (range) of 44 (10–79) months. There was no correlation between the number of previous urogynaecological operations undergone by the patients and the success of the Stamey procedure. However, the frequency of complications other than urinary retention was significant during and after surgery, at 27%, and in accord with the complication rate reported in earlier studies. Compared with other bladder neck suspension procedures, e.g. Burch colposuspension, the Stamey procedure appears to be associated with a higher frequency of postoperative recurrent urinary stress incontinence. Therefore, the Stamey procedure should only be used if the patient demands a minimally invasive surgical procedure for bladder neck suspension. Although 60% of patients were satisfied with the durable improvement in clinical symptoms, it is appropriate to inform patients before surgery of the high recurrence rate after Stamey bladder neck suspension.