Comparison of outcome of low-risk labour in an isolated general practice maternity unit and a specialist maternity hospital.
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 37 (304), 484-7
Abstract
The outcome of labour of 185 low-risk pregnancies at an isolated general practitioner maternity unit was compared with that for 185 comparable low-risk pregnancies at a specialist maternity hospital. No difference was found in mode of delivery or in the proportion of women requiring no analgesia, although significantly more women in the general practice group received analgesia beyond nitrous oxide. There was a significantly higher level of intervention in labour in the maternity hospital group in the form of fetal monitoring and augmentation of labour. The duration of first stage of labour was longer and meconium staining less frequent in the general practice group. Fourteen (7.6%) of the general practice group were transferred in labour to the specialist unit.The results suggest that where considerations for selection of low-risk pregnancy permit, the general practice maternity unit can provide a distinctive style of intrapartum care with minimum intervention.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Place of delivery: a review.1986
- Maternity services: the consumer's view.1986
- IS OBSTETRICS SAFE IN SMALL HOSPITALS?: Evidence from New Zealand's Regionalised Perinatal SystemThe Lancet, 1985
- Place of birth and perinatal mortality.1985
- Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units.BMJ, 1984
- THE SAFETY OF OBSTETRIC SERVICES IN SMALL COMMUNITIES IN NORTHERN ONTARIO1984
- A comparison of low‐risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared‐care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcomeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- HOW SAFE IS GENERAL PRACTITIONER OBSTETRICS?The Lancet, 1980