Compensation between Model Feedbacks and Curtailment of Climate Sensitivity
- 1 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 23 (11), 3009-3018
- https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3380.1
Abstract
The spread in climate sensitivity obtained from 12 general circulation model runs used in the Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicates a 95% confidence interval of 2.1°–5.5°C, but this reflects compensation between model feedbacks. In particular, cloud feedback strength negatively covaries with the albedo feedback as well as with the combined water vapor plus lapse rate feedback. If the compensation between feedbacks is removed, the 95% confidence interval for climate sensitivity expands to 1.9°–8.0°C. Neither of the quoted 95% intervals adequately reflects the understanding of climate sensitivity, but their differences illustrate that model interdependencies must be understood before model spread can be correctly interpreted. The degree of negative covariance between feedbacks is unlikely to result from chance alone. It may, however, result from the method by which the feedbacks were estimated, physical relationships represented in the models, or from conditioning the models upon some combination of observations and expectations. This compensation between model feedbacks—when taken together with indications that variations in radiative forcing and the rate of ocean heat uptake play a similar compensatory role in models—suggests that conditioning of the models acts to curtail the intermodel spread in climate sensitivity. Observations used to condition the models ought to be explicitly stated, or there is the risk of doubly calling on data for purposes of both calibration and evaluation. Conditioning the models upon individual expectation (e.g., anchoring to the Charney range of 3° ± 1.5°C), to the extent that it exists, greatly complicates statistical interpretation of the intermodel spread.This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- High‐CO2 cloud radiative forcing feedback over both land and ocean in a global climate modelGeophysical Research Letters, 2009
- Why are climate models reproducing the observed global surface warming so well?Geophysical Research Letters, 2008
- Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivityGeophysical Research Letters, 2007
- THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change ResearchBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2007
- Quantifying climate change — too rosy a picture?Nature Climate Change, 2007
- Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate modelsGeophysical Research Letters, 2005
- Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptionsGeophysical Research Letters, 2005
- Water Vapor Feedback and Global WarmingAnnual Review of Energy and the Environment, 2000
- The vertical resolution sensitivity of simulated equilibrium temperature and water‐vapour profilesQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2000
- Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An updateJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1996