Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 9 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 373 (2), 123-135
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1504627
Abstract
Patients with advanced squamous-cell non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have disease progression during or after first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options. This randomized, open-label, international, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint–inhibitor antibody, as compared with docetaxel in this patient population. We randomly assigned 272 patients to receive nivolumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks, or docetaxel, at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3 to 13.3) with nivolumab versus 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.3) with docetaxel. The risk of death was 41% lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.79; P<0.001). At 1 year, the overall survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 34 to 50) with nivolumab versus 24% (95% CI, 17 to 31) with docetaxel. The response rate was 20% with nivolumab versus 9% with docetaxel (P=0.008). The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months with nivolumab versus 2.8 months with docetaxel (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.81; P<0.001). The expression of the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) was neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 7% of the patients in the nivolumab group as compared with 55% of those in the docetaxel group. Among patients with advanced, previously treated squamous-cell NSCLC, overall survival, response rate, and progression-free survival were significantly better with nivolumab than with docetaxel, regardless of PD-L1 expression level. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 017 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01642004.)Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patientsNature, 2014
- In VitroCharacterization of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Nivolumab, BMS-936558, andIn VivoToxicology in Non-Human PrimatesCancer Immunology Research, 2014
- Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trialThe Lancet, 2014
- Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapyNature Reviews Cancer, 2012
- Pathology of Lung CancerClinics in Chest Medicine, 2011
- Phase I Study of Single-Agent Anti–Programmed Death-1 (MDX-1106) in Refractory Solid Tumors: Safety, Clinical Activity, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunologic CorrelatesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)European Journal Of Cancer, 2009
- Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trialThe Lancet, 2008
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004