Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 87 (7), 909-913
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01447.x
Abstract
Background: After abdominoperineal resection (APR), anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty has been proposed to avoid abdominal colostomy and improve quality of life. Graciloplasties involving one or two gracilis muscles with various configurations have been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity and functional results in a homogeneous series of patients undergoing double dynamic graciloplasty following APR for rectal cancer. Patients and methods: From May 1995 to May 1998, 15 patients (ten men and five women; mean age 54 (range 39–77) years) underwent anorectal reconstruction with double dynamic graciloplasty after APR for low rectal carcinoma. All patients had preoperative radiotherapy (45 Gy), 11 with concomitant chemotherapy, eight had intraoperative radiotherapy (15 Gy) and ten received adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. The surgical procedure was performed in three stages: APR with coloperineal anastomosis and double graciloplasty (double muscle wrap); implantation of the stimulator 2 months later; and ileostomy closure after a training period. Results: There was no operative death. At a mean of 28 (range 3–48) months of follow-up, there was no local recurrence; two patients had lung metastases. Early and late morbidity occurred in 11 patients, mainly related to the neosphincter (12 of 16 complications). The main complication was stenosis of the neosphincter (n = 6), which developed with electrical stimulation. Of 12 patients available for functional outcome, seven were continent, two were incontinent and three had an abdominal colostomy (two for incontinence, one for sepsis). Compared with patients without stenosis, patients with neosphincter stenosis required major reoperations (four versus zero) and had a poor outcome (two of six versus five of six with a good result). Conclusion: The double dynamic graciloplasty is associated with a high risk of neosphincter stenosis, which may entail morbidity, reintervention and poor functional results. The stenosis is a heterogeneous feature of the neosphincter induced by asymmetrical traction of both gracilis muscles. It is suggested that single dynamic graciloplasty should be used for anorectal reconstruction after APR.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Total anorectal and partial vaginal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty and colonic vaginoplasty after extended abdominoperineal resectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999
- Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: Lessons from a prospective, multicenter trialGastroenterology, 1999
- Dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of patients with faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Restoration of Anal Sphincter Function by Single-Stage Dynamic Graciloplasty with a Modified (Split Sling) TechniqueThe American Journal of Surgery, 1998
- The Electrically Stimulated Gracilis Neosphincter Incorporated as Part of Total Anorectal Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Excision of the RectumAnnals of Surgery, 1996
- Double dynamic graciloplasty and coloperineal pull-through after abdominoperineal resectionEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- Anal Dynamic Graciloplasty in the Treatment of Intractable Fecal IncontinenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplastiesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- Use of the gracilis muscles for sphincteric construction after abdominoperineal resectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1991
- Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincterThe Lancet, 1991