Comparison of Computerized Tomography, Ultrasound and Angiography in Staging Renal Cell Carcinoma
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 127 (4), 712-714
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54011-2
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma was staged prospectively with computerized tomography, ultrasonography and angiography in 23 [human] cases. Staging was correct with computerized tomography in 91% of the lesions (21 of 23), with ultrasound in 70% (16 of 23) and with angiography in 61% (14 of 23). Computerized tomography of the abdomen is the optimal technique to stage renal cell carcinoma and to determine adjacent organ invasion, lymph node metastases and venous extension. When computerized tomography is not available ultrasonography provides a useful alternative to angiography in preoperative tumor assessment in many cases.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of computed tomography and angiography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma.Radiology, 1980
- Inaccuracies in angiographic staging of renal cell carcinomaUrology, 1979
- Abdominal Pansonography in the Evaluation of Renal CancerRadiology, 1979
- Preoperative Determination of Abdominal Extent of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Computed TomographyRadiology, 1979
- How accurate is angiographic staging of renal carcinoma?Urology, 1979
- Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma Extending into the Inferior Vena CavaJournal of Urology, 1978
- Parasitic Blood Supply of NeoplasmsRadiology, 1973
- The Results of Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1969