General practitioners’ perceptions of introducing near-patient testing for common infections into routine primary care: A qualitative study
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
- Vol. 26 (1), 17-21
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430701726285
Abstract
Objective. Near-patient tests are promoted for guiding management of common infections in primary care with a view to enhancing the effectiveness of prescribing decisions and containing antimicrobial resistance. Changes in clinical practice should be based on appraisals of the factors that might influence change, viewed from the perspective of those expected to implement the change. We therefore explored the views of general practitioners concerning the possible introduction of near-patient tests for managing common infections. Design. Qualitative semi-structured interview study. Interviews were recorded and analysed using thematic content analysis. Setting. General practices in south-east Wales, UK. Subjects. A total of 26 general practitioners (GPs) from high fluroquinolone antibiotics prescribing practices and 14 GPs from practices that prescribed fluroquinolones close to the south-east Wales mean. Results. There was strong enthusiasm for a hypothetical near-patient, finger-prick blood tests that could distinguish viral from bacterial infections. Many GPs emphasized that such tests would be valuable in “selling” decisions not to prescribe antibiotics to patients. Concerns included limited additional useful information to guide prescribing above clinical diagnosis alone, that patients might deteriorate even if the tests correctly identified a viral aetiology, and that GPs would need to be convinced by research evidence supporting uptake. Several indicated that tests would be useful only for a limited number of patients and they were concerned by time pressures, apparatus maintenance and quality control, cost, and possible objections from patients, especially children. Conclusions. Despite GP enthusiasm for the concept of a rapid test to distinguish viral from bacterial infection, strategies to promote uptake would be enhanced if concerns were addressed regarding the importance and feasibility of such tests in daily practice.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socially responsible antibiotic choices in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' decisions to prescribe broad-spectrum and fluroquinolone antibioticsFamily Practice, 2007
- General practitioners' perceptions of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative studyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Variation in spirometry utilization between trained general practitioners in practices equipped with a spirometerScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2006
- GPs’ reasons for “non-pharmacological” prescribing of antibiotics A phenomenological studyScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2005
- Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database studyThe Lancet, 2005
- Antibiotics for sore throatPublished by Wiley ,2004
- Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary careBMJ, 1999
- The Effect of Changes in the Consumption of Macrolide Antibiotics on Erythromycin Resistance in Group A Streptococci in FinlandNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977