Evaluation of the New Tumor, Nodes and Metastases Classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 144 (2 Part 1), 238-241
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39420-x
Abstract
The predictive strengths of the third and new fourth editions of the tumor, nodes and metastasis classification are compared using 872 cases of operatively treated renal cell carcinoma. The new tumor, nodes and metastasis classification facilitates an improved assessment of prognosis by subdivision of the former category pT3 into pT3a and pT3b. The new pN classification permits recognition of an especially unfavorable subgroup (pN3) in patients with regional lymph node metastases. The new stage grouping makes a rough subdivision of patients into groups with different prognoses. However, stages 1 and 2 show similar survival rates. Compared to the commonly used Robson stages, the International Union Against Cancer stage grouping has advantages as well as disadvantages. Any resulting recommendations for modification of stages should be subject to testing by other institutions.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- TNM Classification of Genitourinary Tumours 1987—Position of the EORTC Genitourinary GroupBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- TNM Classification of Malignant TumoursPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Histological Grading of Renal Cell CarcinomaEuropean Urology, 1976
- The Results of Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1969
- Niere und ableitende HarnwegePublished by Springer Nature ,1966
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958