Why don't high‐resolution simulations and images match?
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Microscopy
- Vol. 190 (1-2), 99-108
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.2910843.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Electrostatic Contribution to the Forward-Scattering Potential at a Space Charge Layer in High-Energy Electron Diffraction. II. Fringing FieldsActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography, 1997
- Σ5 (210)/[001] Symmetric Tilt Grain Boundary in Yttrium Aluminum GarnetJournal of the American Ceramic Society, 1996
- The Scattering Distribution from Semiconductors as a Function of Angle and Energy Loss in the Electron MicroscopeMRS Proceedings, 1996
- Quantifying The Effects Of Amorphous Layers on Image Contrast Using Energy Filtered Transmission Electron MicroscopyMRS Proceedings, 1994
- Sensitivity and accuracy of CBED pattern matchingUltramicroscopy, 1992
- The contribution of inelastically scattered electrons to high resolution [110] images of AlAs/GaAs heterostructuresUltramicroscopy, 1989
- The contribution of inelastically scattered electrons to high resolution images of (Al, Ga)As/GaAs heterostructuresUltramicroscopy, 1988
- Atomic structure of the NiSi2/(111)Si interfacePhilosophical Magazine A, 1982
- n-Beam lattice images. III. Upper limits of ionicity in W4Nb26O77Acta Crystallographica Section A, 1973
- Relativistic Hartree–Fock X-ray and electron scattering factorsActa Crystallographica Section A, 1968