Trend: Sensationalism versus public affairs content of local TV news: Pennsylvania revisited
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Vol. 38 (2), 205-216
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159409364257
Abstract
This research replicated a study by Adams (1978) in which he reported that the bulk of the news hole in local television newscasts was devoted to coverage of local public affairs and not to sensationalism or human interest stories as critics suggested. In 1992, a random sample of newscasts from the same 10 Pennsylvania stations reveals that news organizations devoted significantly more time to sensational/human interest stories in 1992 than they did in 1976. The time spent on such stories came at the expense of news coverage related to local government, politics, and education.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hard News/Soft News Content of the National Broadcast Networks, 1972–1987Journalism Quarterly, 1992
- Contextual Coverage of Government by Local Television NewsJournalism Quarterly, 1992
- Market Size and TV News ValuesJournalism Quarterly, 1989
- Useful News, Sensational News: Quality, Sensationalism and Local TV NewsJournalism Quarterly, 1986
- Public Affairs and Sensationalism in Local TV News ProgramsJournalism Quarterly, 1982
- A content analysis of local television newscasts: Answering the criticsJournal of Broadcasting, 1982
- Local Public Affairs Content of TV NewsJournalism Quarterly, 1978
- Television Journalism vs. Show Business: A Content Analysis of Eyewitness NewsJournalism Quarterly, 1975
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960