Evolution of Biomineralization

Abstract
Biomineralization among living organisms is widespread, occurring in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. It is diverse with some 60 or so minerals known to be formed by organisms under a wide variety of conditions. They are deposited at many different locations both inside and outside cells. Biomineralization occurs on such an enormous scale that it influences processes in the biosphere itself. It is, therefore, of interest to determine how this all came about—the evolution of biomineralization. The evolutionary history of biomineralization is a fascinating subject in its own right, which is the primary reason for including it in this book. However, a well-substantiated understanding of this subject is also of crucial importance to the interpretation of many aspects of research into the mechanisms of biomineralization in living organisms. An example is the observation by Veis et al. (1986) that antibodies raised against the rat incisor acidic proteins, phosphophoryns, crossreact with proteins extracted from a sea urchin test. The proteins presumably share some similar molecular structures. Did they inherit them from a common ancestor or did they evolve independently from each other to fulfill similar functions? This type of question can be asked about many comparative studies in biomineralization between phyla or even within lower taxa of the same phyla. As long as we do not have answers to these questions, the powerful tool of comparative biology in biomineralization is compromised. Studying the evolution of biomineralization has one enormous advantage over many other topics in evolutionary biology; the very material that we are interested in has the best chance of surviving the vagaries of time and being preserved in the fossil record. The fossil record at least during the last 600 million years or so is, for the most part, a documentation of remnants of the history of mineralized hard part formation by organisms. Thus, the evolution of biomineralization is one topic that can, and that should be based on the direct documentation of the fossil record. This is the way it is presented in this chapter. The corollary of this statement is also worth considering. The fossil record should be interpreted bearing in mind the evolution of biomineralization.