Computer-generated mailed reminders for influenza immunization
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 7 (5), 535-537
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02599460
Abstract
A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was performed at a community health center to measure the impact of computer-generated reminders mailed to patients on the rate of influenza immunization. High-risk patients were randomized to one of three groups: 1) usual care, 2) one reminder letter, offering free influenza immunization without an appointment, or 3) two sequential reminder letters, offering the same. The reminders did not significantly affect rates of influenza immunization. Analysis of the combined groups indicates that an appointment with a primary care provider remains the most reliable method of immunizing high-risk patients at this health center.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influenza vaccination. Are we doing better than we think?Archives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Influenza VaccinationArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- A target-based model for increasing influenza immunizations in private practiceJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1991
- Preventive Care Guidelines: 1991Annals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Improving influenza vaccination performance in an HMO setting: the use of computer-generated reminders and peer comparison feedback.American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- The effect of patient-carried reminder cards on the performance of health maintenance measuresArchives of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Postcard Reminders and Influenza VaccinationJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1989
- Immunization Policies and Vaccine Coverage Among AdultsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988
- Increasing influenza vaccination among high-risk elderly: a randomized controlled trial of a mail cue in an HMO setting.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- The Application of Computer-Based Medical-Record Systems in Ambulatory PracticeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984