Factors Associated With Poor Predictability by Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 103 (4), 515-518
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1985.01050040057017
Abstract
• In this study, we evaluated and compared two groups of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation cases. One group consisted of patients whose postoperative refraction was accurately predicted by IOL calculation formulas, while the other group included patients whose postoperative refraction was poorly predicted by the same formulas. We found that although postoperative astigmatism was greater in the poorly predicted group, preoperative to postoperative changes in astigmatism did not differ between the two groups. The poorly predicted group also had a shorter average axial length, a greater proportion of females, and an increased variability in most of the measurements we performed. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of measured postoperative anterior chamber depth, age at the time of the surgery, IOL power and style implanted, complication rate, or preoperative corneal integrity.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The fudged formula for intraocular lens power calculationsAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1982
- Preoperative Cataract Evaluation: Intraocular Lens Power CalculationInternational Ophthalmology Clinics, 1982
- The Optical Quality of Currently Manufactured Intraocular LensesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1979
- Determination of the Expected Power of the Implant Lens by UltrasoundOphthalmologica, 1975
- Ultrasonography and Lens ImplantationOphthalmologica, 1975
- Changes in the Corneal Curvature Following Cataract Extraction*American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1951