Measuring inequalities in health in the presence of multiple‐category morbidity indicators
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- econometric and-health-economics
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 3 (4), 281-291
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730030409
Abstract
This paper considers the problems which arise in seeking to measure socioeconomic inequalities in health when the health indicator is a categorical variable, such as self-assessed health. It shows that the standard approach—which involves dichotomizing the categorical variable—is unreliable. The degree of measured inequality is found to depend on the cut-off point chosen and the choice of cut-off point to affect the conclusions one can reach about trends in or differences in health inequality. The paper goes on to propose an alternative approach which involves constructing a latent health variable and then measuring inequalities in this latent variable by means of a variant of the health concentration curve.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Income Inequality and Living Standards: Changes in the 1970s and 1980sFiscal Studies, 1991
- On the measurement of inequalities in healthSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Class Mortality Differentials, Income Distribution and Trends in Poverty 1921–1981Journal of Social Policy, 1989
- EQUITY IN THE FINANCE AND DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE: SOME TENTATIVE CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISONSOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1989
- Social-class inequality in infant mortality in England and Wales from 1921 to 1980European Journal of Population, 1988
- A new concept of Lorenz dominationEconomics Letters, 1987
- Social Class Inequality in Mortality From 1921 to 1972 in England and WalesPopulation Studies, 1985
- A note on the calculation and interpretation of the Gini indexEconomics Letters, 1984
- Ranking Income DistributionsEconomica, 1983
- On the Estimation of Lorenz Curves from Grouped ObservationsInternational Economic Review, 1973