Surgical Site Infection in Spinal Surgery
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 37 (15), 1340-1345
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318246a53a
Abstract
Study Design. Retrospective analysis. Objective. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of using an automated approach to administrative claims data to assess the rate and risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal procedures. Summary of Background Data. SSI is a major indicator of health care quality. A wide range of SSI rates have been proposed in the literature depending on clinical setting and procedure type. Methods. All spinal surgeries performed at a university-affiliated tertiary-care center from July 2005 to December 2010 were identified using diagnosis-related group, current procedural terminology, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes and were validated through chart review. Rates of SSI and associated risk factors were calculated using univariate regression analysis. Odds ratios were calculated through multivariate logistic regression. Results. A total of 6628 hospital visits were identified. The cumulative incidence of SSI was 2.9%. Procedural risk factors associated with a statistically significant increase in rates of infection were the following: sacral involvement (9.6%), fusions greater than 7 levels (7.8%), fusions greater than 12 levels (10.4%), cases with an osteotomy (6.5%), operative time longer than 5 hours (5.1%), transfusions of red blood cells (5.0%), serum (7.4%), and autologous blood (4.1%). Patient-based risk factors included anemia (4.3%), diabetes mellitus (4.2%), coronary artery disease (4.7%), diagnosis of coagulopathy (7.8%), and bone or connective tissue neoplasm (5.0%). Conclusion. Used individually, diagnosis-related group, current procedural terminology, and ICD-9 codes cannot completely capture a patient population. Using an algorithm combining all 3 coding systems to generate both inclusion and exclusion criteria, we were able to analyze a specific population of spinal surgery patients within a high-volume medical center. Within that group, risk factors found to increase infection rates were isolated and can serve to focus hospital-wide efforts to decrease surgery-related morbidity and improve patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postoperative Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Spinal Tumor SurgerySpine, 2011
- Rates of Infection After Spine Surgery Based on 108,419 ProceduresSpine, 2011
- Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality of Adult Scoliosis SurgerySpine, 2011
- Risk factors for surgical site infection following spine surgery: efficacy of intraoperative saline irrigationJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2010
- Surgical Site Infection in Spinal MetastasisSpine, 2009
- Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS). Inter-country comparison of rates of surgical site infection – opportunities and limitationsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2007
- Pay-for-PerformanceSpine, 2007
- Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitalsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2005
- Surgical site infection – a European perspective of incidence and economic burdenInternational Wound Journal, 2004
- The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care QualityInstitute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care QualityJAMA, 1998