Value of a Protective Stoma in Low Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 45 (9), 1164-1171
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is a major problem in colorectal surgery and in particular in operations for low rectal cancer. The present study investigates the question whether a protective stoma can reduce the (clinical and radiologic) anastomotic leakage rate and/or the rate of leakage requiring surgery. The investigation took the form of a prospective multicenter study involving 75 German hospitals and was performed between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 1999. A comparison was made of the postoperative results of procedures performed with and those performed without a protective stoma in patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection. In addition, logistic regression using the target criteria, overall anastomotic leakage and anastomotic leakage requiring surgery, was applied. Among the 3,695 operations performed for carcinoma of the rectum or colon, 482 were low anterior resections. In 334 patients (69.3 percent) no protective stoma was constructed, whereas 148 (30.7 percent) received such protection. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and body mass index were identical in both groups. In the group receiving a protective stoma, however, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was more common, the tumors were lower-and thus the total mesorectal excision rate higher, the intraoperative complication rate was higher, and the duration of the operation was longer. The differences were all significant. The major criterion (overall anastomotic leakage rate) was identical in the two groups, but the rate of leakage requiring surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving a protective stoma (p = 0.028). The logistic regression revealed that use of a protective stoma is a predictor of protection against anastomotic leakage requiring surgery. The distance of the tumor from the anal verge and the duration of the operation are further predictors. The particular benefit of a covering stoma is reduction in the rate of leaks requiring surgery and thus in the severe consequences of an anastomotic leakage.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Diverting Colostomy Increases Anastomotic Leakage in the Rat ColonEuropean Surgical Research, 2000
- Prospective Evaluation of Selective Defunctioning Stoma for Low Anterior Resection with Total Mesorectal ExcisionWorld Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch–anal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancerInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1998
- Factors Associated With the Occurrence of Leaks in Stapled Rectal Anastomoses: A Review of 1,014 PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1997
- Influence of proximal end diverting colostomy on the healing of left-sided colonic anastomosis: an experimental study in ratsInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1995
- Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence?International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1991
- The effect of diverting colostomy on anastomotic healing after resection of left colon obstructionInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1990