Certain Inevitable Relationships among the "Unipolar" Extremity Leads
- 1 June 1952
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 5 (6), 878-884
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.5.6.878
Abstract
It is demonstrated in this paper, both mathematically and experimentally, that the scalar sums of the three "unipolar" extremity leads when recorded with resistors of high value in the neutral network must equal zero if all the possible sources of error are eliminated. However, this fact has no bearing upon the validity of the Einthoven hypothesis or upon the theoretic concepts underlying the Wilson central terminal. In fact, when any three points are chosen at random to make a central terminal and the potential differences between each of the three points in turn and the central terminal are recorded, the scalar sum of these potential differences will invariably equal zero. It is also shown why any augmented "unipolar" extremity lead must be exactly 50 per cent greater than the respective unaugmented "unipolar" extremity lead if properly recorded.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- An analysis of the relative accuracies of the Wilson and Goldberger methods for registering unipolar and augmented unipolar electrocardiographic leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1949
- Unipolar electrocardiographic leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1949
- On Einthoven's triangle, the theory of unipolar electrocardiographic leads, and the interpretation of the precordial electrocardiogramAmerican Heart Journal, 1946
- The validity of the Einthoven triangle hypothesisAmerican Heart Journal, 1945
- A simple, indifferent, electrocardiographic electrode of zero potential and a technique of obtaining augmented, unipolar, extremity leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1942
- Electrocardiograms that represent the potential variations of a single electrodeAmerican Heart Journal, 1934