Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous Polyps
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 328 (13), 901-906
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199304013281301
Abstract
The identification and removal of adenomatous polyps and post-polypectomy surveillance are considered to be important for the control of colorectal cancer. In current practice, the intervals between colonoscopies after polypectomy are variable, often a year long, and not based on data from randomized clinical trials. We sought to determine whether follow-up colonoscopy at three years would detect important colonic lesions as well as follow-up colonoscopy at both one and three years.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Risk of Colorectal Cancer after Excision of Rectosigmoid AdenomasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991
- Prospective Study of the Frequency and Size Distribution of Polyps Missed by ColonoscopyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- Best Subsets Logistic RegressionBiometrics, 1989
- Risk of colorectal cancer in adenoma‐bearing individuals within a defined populationInternational Journal of Cancer, 1986
- Colorectal Polyps and the Risk of Subsequent CarcinomaMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1986
- Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal AdenomasEndoscopy, 1985
- Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic PolypectomyEndoscopy, 1982
- The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectumCancer, 1975
- Risk of Recurrence of Colon PolypsAnnals of Surgery, 1975