Abstract
This paper discusses critically observations of mixing processes across density interfaces in laboratory experiments and inferences that have been made and can be made from these observations. Fluxes of heat or salt and entrainment velocities have been found to depend on negative powers of an overall Richardson number Ri* based on the buoyancy jump across the interface, the depth of the homogeneous layer and the intensity of the turbulence near the source. When the Reynolds and Péclet numbers are large, the fluxes or entrainment velocities appear to be proportional to the minus one and minus three-halves powers of Ri* for flows with and without mean shear respectively, and this difference has caused speculation about the accuracy of the experimental data and about the reasons for the two laws if the difference is real. In the present discussion, we accept the accuracy of the two laws and attribute the higher entrainment rate for shear flows to the decrease of r.m.s. velocities near the interface with increasing Ri* in the case of zero shear. A plausible argument yields the unifying result that the entrainment rates in both cases are proportional to Ri−1, where Ri is a Richardson number based on the buoyancy jump and velocities and lengths characteristic of the turbulence near the interface. It is suggested that the $Ri^{-\frac{3}{2}}$ behaviour inferred by Turner is based on an erroneous interpretation of experimental data.In the course of the discussion, it is shown that the drag coefficient in flow of a stratified fluid over a rough surface is independent of the Richardson number (or density jump across the interface or inversion) and depends only on the ratio of the roughness length to the depth of the homogeneous layer. This has obvious implications for problems of parameterizing the momentum flux near the ground in the atmosphere.