Alterations of pre‐mRNA splicing in cancer
- 11 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
- Vol. 42 (4), 342-357
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20156
Abstract
Recent genomewide analyses of alternative splicing (AS) indicate that up to 70% of human genes may have alternative splice forms, suggesting that AS together with various posttranslational modifications plays a major role in the production of proteome complexity. Splice‐site selection under normal physiological conditions is regulated in the developmental stage in a tissue type‐specific manner by changing the concentrations and the activity of splicing regulatory proteins. Whereas spliceosomal errors resulting in the production of aberrant transcripts rarely occur in normal cells, they seem to be an intrinsic property of cancer cells. Changes in splice‐site selection have been observed in various types of cancer and may affect genes implicated in tumor progression (for example, CD44, MDM2, and FHIT) and in susceptibility to cancer (for example, BRCA1 and APC). Splicing defects can arise from inherited or somatic mutations in cis‐acting regulatory elements (splice donor, acceptor and branch sites, and exonic and intronic splicing enhancers and silencers) or variations in the composition, concentration, localization, and activity of regulatory proteins. This may lead to altered efficiency of splice‐site recognition, resulting in overexpression or down‐regulation of certain splice variants, a switch in splice‐site usage, or failure to recognize splice sites correctly, resulting in cancer‐specific splice forms. At least in some cases, changes in splicing have been shown to play a functionally significant role in tumorigenesis, either by inactivating tumor suppressors or by gain of function of proteins promoting tumor development. Moreover, cancer‐specific splicing events may generate novel epitopes that can be recognized by the host's immune system as cancer specific and may serve as targets for immunotherapy. Thus, the identification of cancer‐specific splice forms provides a novel source for the discovery of diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers and tumor antigens suitable as targets for therapeutic intervention.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of alternatively spliced mRNA variants related to cancers by genome-wide ESTs alignmentOncogene, 2004
- Splicing double: insights from the second spliceosomeNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2003
- Nova Regulates GABAA Receptor γ2 Alternative Splicing via a Distal Downstream UCAU-Rich Intronic Splicing EnhancerMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2003
- Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicingNature Reviews Genetics, 2002
- CD44 in CancerCritical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 2002
- Characterization of aberrant FHIT transcripts in gastric adenocarcinomasExperimental & Molecular Medicine, 2001
- Somatic NF1 mutational spectrum in benign neurofibromas: mRNA splice defects are common among point mutationsHuman Genetics, 2001
- Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genomeNature, 2001
- Exon III splicing switch of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor-2 and -3 can be induced by FGF-1 or FGF-2Oncogene, 1998
- The HGF receptor family: unconventional signal transducers for invasive cell growthGenes to Cells, 1996