Systematic Review of the Staging Performance of18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Esophageal Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 15 September 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (18), 3805-3812
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.01.083
Abstract
Purpose Despite the increasing number of publications concerning 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for staging of esophageal cancer and the increasing availability of this novel diagnostic modality, its exact role in preoperative staging of these tumors is still unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET in preoperative staging of patients with esophageal cancer, and to calculate summary estimates of its sensitivity and specificity. Methods The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study was performed. Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies had several design deficiencies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.69) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91), respectively. For distant metastases, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.76) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0), respectively. Conclusion FDG-PET showed moderate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases, and reasonable sensitivity and specificity in detection of distant lymphatic and hematogenous metastases.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Helical CT versus EUS with fine needle aspiration for celiac nodal assessment in patients with esophageal cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Positron Emission Tomography Scanning: Current and Future ApplicationsAnnual Review of Medicine, 2002
- Recent changes in the epidemiology of esophageal cancerSurgical Oncology, 2001
- A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinomaGut, 2001
- Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Adenocarcinoma of Distal Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: Long‐term Results of Surgical Treatment in a North Indian CenterWorld Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Esophageal cancer staging: improved accuracy by endoscopic ultrasound of celiac lymph nodesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: A comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteriaThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Prediction of outcome in “Resectable” esophageal carcinomaJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1993
- Results of surgical treatment in 6,123 cases of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardiaJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1989