REPORTED INCIDENCE RATES OF WORK‐RELATED SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: USING META‐ANALYSIS TO EXPLAIN REPORTED RATE DISPARITIES
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 56 (3), 607-631
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- Sexual harassment: factors affecting attitudes and perceptionsSex Roles, 1997
- Patient sexual behavior and sexual harassment: A national survey of female psychologists.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1997
- Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- When pranks become harassment: The case of african American women firefightersSex Roles, 1996
- SEXUAL HARASSMENT RESEARCH: A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUEPersonnel Psychology, 1995
- NOW THAT WE ARE HERE:Gender & Society, 1993
- Sexual Harassment in Medical TrainingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Scope and nature of sexual harassment in nursingThe Journal of Sex Research, 1987