Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Hirulog Versus Heparin in Patients Receiving Streptokinase and Aspirin for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HERO)
- 7 October 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 96 (7), 2155-2161
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.7.2155
Abstract
Background Thrombolytic therapy improves survival after myocardial infarction through reperfusion of the infarct-related artery. Thrombin generated during thrombolytic administration may reduce the efficacy of thrombolysis. A direct thrombin inhibitor may improve early patency rates. Methods and Results Four hundred twelve patients presenting within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation were given aspirin and streptokinase and randomized in a double-blind manner to receive up to 60 hours of either heparin (5000 U bolus followed by 1000 to 1200 U/h), low-dose hirulog (0.125 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.25 mg · kg −1 · h −1 for 12 hours then 0.125 mg · kg −1 · h −1 ), or high-dose hirulog (0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.5 mg · kg −1 · h −1 for 12 hours then 0.25 mg · kg −1 · h −1 ). The primary outcome was Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial (TIMI) grade 3 flow of the infarct-related artery at 90 to 120 minutes. TIMI 3 flow was 35% (95% CI, 28% to 44%) with heparin, 46% (95% CI, 38% to 55%) with low-dose hirulog, and 48% (95% CI, 40% to 57%) with high-dose hirulog (heparin versus hirulog, P =.023; heparin versus high-dose hirulog, P =.03). At 48 hours, reocclusion had occurred in 7% of heparin, 5% of low-dose hirulog, and 1% of high-dose hirulog patients ( P =NS). By 35 days, death, cardiogenic shock, or reinfarction had occurred in 25 heparin (17.9%), 19 low-dose hirulog (14%), and 17 high-dose hirulog patients (12.5%) ( P =NS). Two strokes occurred with heparin, none with low-dose hirulog, and two with high-dose hirulog. Major bleeding (40% from the groin site) occurred in 28% of heparin, 14% of low-dose hirulog, and 19% of high-dose hirulog patients (heparin versus low-dose hirulog, P <.01). Conclusions Hirulog was more effective than heparin in producing early patency in patients treated with aspirin and streptokinase without increasing the risk of major bleeding. Direct thrombin inhibition may improve clinical outcome.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Recombinant Hirudin with Heparin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patientsThe Lancet, 1994
- Usefulness and tolerability of Hirulog, a direct thrombin-inhibitor, in unstable angina pectorisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- An International Randomized Trial Comparing Four Thrombolytic Strategies for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies on Hirulog: A Potent and Specific Direct Thrombin InhibitorPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41 299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1992
- Clot-bound thrombin is protected from inhibition by heparin-antithrombin III but is susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1990
- Intermittent Coronary Occlusion in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Effect of Intravenous Streptokinase on Left Ventricular Function and Early Survival after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Paradoxic elevation of fibrinopeptide A after streptokinase: Evidence for continued thrombosis despite intense fibrinolysisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987