Cohort Profile: The Whitehall II study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 34 (2), 251-256
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh372
Abstract
The Whitehall studies have come to be closely associated with the investigation of socioeconomic differences in physical and mental illness and mortality: the social gradient. 1, 2 That was not the initial purpose of the first Whitehall study. Donald Reid and Geoffrey Rose set up Whitehall, in the 1960s, as a kind of British Framingham: 3 ‘Framingham’ insofar as it was a longitudinal study of cardiorespiratory disease and diabetes, looking at individual risk factors for disease; ‘British’ in that it was done on the cheap—a simple screening examination with follow-up limited to deaths identified from the National Health Service Central Registry.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Status SyndromeSignificance, 2004
- A comparison of socioeconomic differences in physical functioning and perceived health among male and female employees in Britain, Finland and JapanSocial Science & Medicine, 2004
- Socioeconomic trajectories across the life course and health outcomes in midlife: evidence for the accumulation hypothesis?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- The effect of control at home on CHD events in the Whitehall II study: Gender differences in psychosocial domestic pathways to social inequalities in CHDSocial Science & Medicine, 2003
- Adrenocortical, Autonomic, and Inflammatory Causes of the Metabolic SyndromeCirculation, 2002
- Employment status and health after privatisation in white collar civil servants: prospective cohortBMJ, 2001
- MORTALITY DECLINE AND WIDENING SOCIAL INEQUALITIESThe Lancet, 1986
- Changing social-class distribution of heart disease.BMJ, 1978
- CARDIORESPIRATORY DISEASE AND DIABETES AMONG MIDDLE-AGED MALE CIVIL SERVANTS: A study of Screening and InterventionThe Lancet, 1974
- CIVILISATION AND PEPTIC ULCER*1The Lancet, 1962