Understanding conflicting cultural models of outdoor cats to overcome conservation impasse
Open Access
- 6 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 34 (5), 1190-1199
- https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13530
Abstract
Many conservation conflicts are scientifically complex yet are rooted in value conflicts, which result in an impasse. Additional biological information alone is insufficient to resolve this type of conflict. Conceptual models that articulate the material aspects of a system are increasingly used to identify areas where parties disagree. Yet, modeling processes typically follow the conveners’ rules for discussing and assessing the topic, which can exacerbate conflict. Researchers have identified a need for processes that require participants to reflect on the limits of their own philosophical assumptions and acknowledge other perspectives. Cultural models are a promising tool for this purpose because they include nonmaterial beliefs, morals, and values that guide people's understanding of how to interact with an issue, sometimes subconsciously. We explored how cultural models used with conceptual models can improve understanding of value conflicts and used outdoor cat management as a case study. We conducted interviews and focus group discussions with wildlife conservation and cat welfare professionals involved in outdoor cat policy discussions in Hawaii and Washington, D.C. From these conversations, we developed a conceptual model of the outdoor cat management system and cultural models that led stakeholders to weigh elements of the conceptual model differently. Whereas wildlife conservation professionals generally spoke about outdoor cats as invasive species, cat welfare professionals spoke about them as homeless pets. These conflicting conceptualizations of what an outdoor cat is may help explain the root of many longstanding disagreements. Examining how and when stakeholders invoke different cultural models allowed us to identify management actions that work with, rather than challenge, those models. Dialogue that embraces conflicting cultural models can be difficult and uncomfortable, but has great potential to overcome conservation impasse and achieve lasting conservation results. Article impact statement: Understanding unstated yet conflicting cultural models of cats as invasive species versus homeless pets can transform conservation conflicts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reservedKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human–Wildlife InteractionsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2019
- Approaching human-animal relationships from multiple angles: A synthetic perspectiveBiological Conservation, 2018
- Purpose, processes, partnerships, and products: four Ps to advance participatory socio‐environmental modelingEcological Applications, 2017
- Understanding public perceptions of risk regarding outdoor pet cats to inform conservation actionConservation Biology, 2016
- Understanding Attitudes Toward the Control of Nonnative Wild and Feral Mammals: Similarities and Differences in the Opinions of the General Public, Animal Protectionists, and Conservationists in New Zealand (Aotearoa)Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2013
- Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 7. The Domestic Cat (Felis catus)Pacific Science, 2012
- The Legal Status of Cats in New Zealand: A Perspective on the Welfare of Companion, Stray, and Feral Domestic Cats (Felis catus)Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2010
- Conceptual Models as Tools for Communication Across DisciplinesConservation Ecology, 2003
- Dealing with Deep Value DifferencesPublished by SAGE Publications ,1999
- Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approachHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 1996