Fast track hysterectomy
- 30 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 98 (1), 18-22
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00342-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- A Randomized Trial With a Cost-Consequence Analysis After Laparoscopic and Abdominal HysterectomyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: A review and complications of 1165 operationsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Vergleich der laparoskopisch assistierten vaginalen Hysterektomie (LAVH) mit der abdominalen HysterektomieGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 1996
- A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal: A prospective randomised study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1996
- Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time?The Lancet, 1995
- A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993