Obstetricians presenting amniocentesis to pregnant women: Practice observed
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
- Vol. 11 (1), 3-10
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839308403189
Abstract
The aim of this study is to describe how obstetricians present amniocentesis to women eligible because of their age and hence increased likelihood of having a child with Down's syndrome and other chromosome abnormalities. Routine antenatal consultations between 25 women and 17 doctors were tape recorded. Presentations focused upon the risks of fetal abnormality, and the risks of pregnancy loss following amniocentesis. The word risk was used to denote probability and frequently used in conjunction with words to denote value. Although obstetricians frequently presented probabilistic information, this tended to be presented in a binary fashion, that is, as denoting either high or low risk. Equivalent probabilities were described as low in connection with fetal loss, and high in connection with Down's syndrome. The probabilities of these two events were contrasted on half the occasions when they were presented. Implicit in obstetricians' presentations of amniocentesis was an assumption that all women would or should undergo the procedure. Information concerning the range of conditions detected at routine amniocentesis were infrequently mentioned and never described. The results of this descriptive study illustrate that information germane to decisions of whether to undergo amniocentesis is frequently presented in such a way as to encourage uptake of the test, rather than to foster informed decision-making.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: Practice observedPublic Health, 1992
- Pancreatic enzyme supplements in cystic fibrosisThe Lancet, 1991
- Perceived risk not actual risk predicts uptake of amniocentesisBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Psychological costs of screening.BMJ, 1989
- Factors influencing the uptake of screening for open neural‐tube defects and amniocentesis to test for Down's syndromeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patientsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1989
- Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: Should the doctor tell all?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Odds in genetic counsellingJournal of Medical Genetics, 1982
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Genetic counseling — the postcounseling period: I. Parents' perceptions of uncertaintyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1979