Labor Progression and Risk of Cesarean Delivery in Electively Induced Nulliparas
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 105 (4), 698-704
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000157436.68847.3b
Abstract
To describe the pattern of labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in women whose labor was electively induced. We analyzed data on all low-risk, nulliparous women with an elective induction or spontaneous onset of labor between 37 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks from January 2002 to March 2004 at a single institution. The median duration of labor by each centimeter of cervical dilation and the risk of cesarean delivery were computed for 143 women with preinduction cervical ripening and oxytocin induction, 286 women with oxytocin induction, and 1,771 women with a spontaneous onset of labor. An intracervical Foley catheter was used to ripen the cervix. Electively induced labor with cervical ripening had substantially slower latent and early active phases. After controlling for potential confounders, women who had an elective induction with cervical ripening had 3.5 times the risk of cesarean delivery during the first stage of labor (95% confidence interval 2.7-4.5), compared with those admitted in spontaneous labor. Elective induction without cervical ripening, on the other hand, was associated with a faster labor progression from 4 to 10 cm (266 compared with 358 minutes, P < .01) and did not increase the risk of cesarean delivery, compared with those in spontaneous labor. The pattern of labor progression differs substantially for women with an electively induced labor compared with those with spontaneous onset of labor. Furthermore, elective induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix has a high rate of labor arrest and a substantially increased risk of cesarean delivery. II-2.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's the Relative Risk? A Method to Directly Estimate Risk Ratios in Cohort Studies of Common OutcomesAnnals of Epidemiology, 2002
- Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategiesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripeningPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indicationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at termPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous womenPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Elective Induction Versus Spontaneous Labor: A Case-Control Analysis of Safety and EfficacyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: A retrospective study of complications and outcomeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992