A Trial of Combination Antimalarial Therapies in Children from Papua New Guinea
Top Cited Papers
- 11 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 359 (24), 2545-2557
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0804915
Abstract
Malaria control is difficult where there is intense year-round transmission of multiple plasmodium species, such as in Papua New Guinea. Between April 2005 and July 2007, we conducted an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study of conventional chloroquine–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and artesunate–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine, and artemether–lumefantrine in children in Papua New Guinea 0.5 to 5 years of age who had falciparum or vivax malaria. The primary end point was the rate of adequate clinical and parasitologic response at day 42 after the start of treatment with regard to Plasmodium falciparum, after correction for reinfections identified through polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) genotyping of polymorphic loci in parasite DNA. Secondary end points included the rate of adequate clinical and parasitologic response at day 42 with regard to P. vivax without correction through PCR genotyping. Of 2802 febrile children screened, 482 with falciparum malaria and 195 with vivax malaria were included. The highest rate of adequate clinical and parasitologic response for P. falciparum was in the artemether–lumefantrine group (95.2%), as compared with 81.5% in the chloroquine–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine group (P=0.003), 85.4% in the artesunate–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine group (P=0.02), and 88.0% in the dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine group (P=0.06). The rate of adequate clinical and parasitologic response for P. vivax in the dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine group (69.4%) was more than twice that in each of the other three treatment groups. The in vitro chloroquine and piperaquine levels that inhibited growth of local P. falciparum isolates by 50% correlated significantly (PP. falciparum and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine against P. vivax. The relatively high rate of treatment failure with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine against P. falciparum may reflect cross-resistance between chloroquine and piperaquine. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12605000550606.)This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new global malaria eradication strategyThe Lancet, 2008
- Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Piperaquine and Chloroquine in Melanesian Children with Uncomplicated MalariaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2008
- Clinical and Pharmacological Determinants of the Therapeutic Response to Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Drug-Resistant MalariaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- A comparative study on the efficacy of artesunate plus sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine versus artemether-lumefantrine in eastern SudanMalaria Journal, 2007
- Efficacy and tolerability of four antimalarial combinations in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in SenegalMalaria Journal, 2007
- Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized TrialPLoS Clinical Trials, 2007
- Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparisonThe Lancet, 2007
- Efficacy and effectiveness of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artesunate-mefloquine in falciparum malaria: an open-label randomised comparisonThe Lancet, 2006
- The epidemiology of malaria in Papua New GuineaTrends in Parasitology, 2003
- In Vitro Activities of Piperaquine and Other 4-Aminoquinolines against Clinical Isolates of Plasmodium falciparum in CameroonAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2003