Histopathological Diagnostic Discrepancies in Soft Tissue Tumours Referred to a Specialist Centre
Open Access
- 27 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Sarcoma
- Vol. 2009, 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/741975
Abstract
Aims. A study was performed to determine areas of diagnostic discrepancy in the reporting of cases of soft tissue tumours referred to a specialist sarcoma unit. This was to pinpoint common discrepancies and to determine their causes. Methods and Results. We compared the sarcoma unit's histopathology reports with referring reports on 349 specimens from 277 patients with suspected or proven soft tissue tumours in a one-year period. Conclusions. Diagnostic agreement was found in 256 of 349 cases (73.4%), with minor diagnostic discrepancy in 55 cases (15.7%) and major discrepancy in 38 cases (10.9%). Benign/malignant discordances accounted for only 5% of all discrepancies (5 cases). The most common discrepancies occurred in tumour classification, including diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour and leiomyosarcoma and the subtyping of spindle cell sarcomas, as well as in tumour grading that could conceivably lead to changes in clinical management. Major diagnostic discrepancies leading to management change occurred in a relatively select range of tumour groups, and almost all discrepancies occurred due to differences in tumour interpretation between general or nonsoft tissue pathologists, and pathologists at the specialist unit. The findings support guidelines by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence that diagnostic review of soft tissue tumours should be performed by specialist soft tissue pathologists.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gastrointestinal Kaposi’s sarcoma: CD117 expression and the potential for misdiagnosis as gastrointestinal stromal tumourHistopathology, 2008
- A Novel Monoclonal Antibody Against DOG1 is a Sensitive and Specific Marker for Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2008
- Consultative (Expert) Second Opinions in Soft Tissue PathologyAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2001
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Versus Intra-abdominal Fibromatosis of the Bowel WallThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2000
- Dedifferentiated LiposarcomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1997
- Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Sarcomas in north west England: I. Histopathological peer reviewBritish Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Histopathology peer review of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma: the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Soft-tissue and bone sarcoma histopathology peer review: the frequency of disagreement in diagnosis and the need for second pathology opinions. The Southeastern Cancer Study Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- Reproducibility of a histopathologic grading system for adult soft tissue sarcomaCancer, 1986