Sarcomas in north west England: I. Histopathological peer review
Open Access
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 64 (2), 315-320
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1991.298
Abstract
A total of 468 cases of bone, soft tissue and visceral sarcomas (and certain other tumours) diagnosed during the years 1982-84 in North West England were entered in a study of histopathological peer review, incidence and survival. This paper describes the effects of peer review. Material was reviewed by a panel of five pathologists for 413 of the 450 cases originally registered as sarcomas with the Regional Cancer Registry. The diagnosis of sarcomas was confirmed in 76% cases and and there was agreement on sub-type for 53% cases. Measures of agreement were lowest for the two sub-types most commonly diagnosed i.e. malignant fibrous histiocytoma and leiomyosarcoma. Degree of agreement between individual pathologists and final panel diagnosis was also very variable but never less than 65%. It is concluded that second opinion is essential in cases of presumed sarcomas for studies of incidence and aetiology and to ensure that appropriate treatment is selected.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Histopathology peer review of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma: the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Pathologic analysis of advanced adult soft tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, and mesotheliomas. The eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) experienceCancer, 1989
- Soft-tissue and bone sarcoma histopathology peer review: the frequency of disagreement in diagnosis and the need for second pathology opinions. The Southeastern Cancer Study Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- Quality Assurance of Histopathologic Diagnoses: A Prospective Audit of Three Thousand CasesAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984