A consequence of omitted covariates when estimating odds ratios
- 31 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 44 (1), 77-81
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90203-l
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary DataInternational Statistical Review, 1991
- Confounding in Epidemiologic StudiesPublished by JSTOR ,1989
- RE: “CONFOUNDING CONFOUNDING”American Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- CONFOUNDING CONFOUNDING1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- The Amalgamation and Geometry of Two-by-Two Contingency TablesThe Annals of Statistics, 1987
- INTERPRETATION AND CHOICE OF EFFECT MEASURES IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariatesBiometrika, 1984
- Specification error in multinomial logit models: Analysis of the omitted variable biasJournal of Econometrics, 1982
- CONFOUNDING: ESSENCE AND DETECTION1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- Validity in estimating relative risk in case-control studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1973