Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 72 (12), 971-972
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800721212
Abstract
The appendix stump was ligated and doubly invaginated in 374 patients and was simply ligated in 361 in a prospective, randomized trial of 735 consecutive appendicectomies. The two groups were similar with respect to sex, age, degree of appendiceal inflammation and antibiotic treatment. The incidence of wound infection and postoperative pyrexia and the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant intergroup difference. The median operating time was slightly shorter in the group without invagination. Simple ligation facilitates and shortens appendicectomy. It produces no deformation of the caecal wall that subsequently may be mistaken for a caecal neoplasm. Simple ligation is therefore recommended as standard procedure in appendicectomy.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Appendicectomy: An assessment of the advisability of stump invaginationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Some observations on appendicectomy with particular reference to techniqueBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969