Reliance on Visible Speech Cues During Multimodal Language Processing: Individual and Age Differences
- 23 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Experimental Aging Research
- Vol. 33 (4), 373-397
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730701525303
Abstract
The current study demonstrates that when a strong inhibition process is invoked during multimodal (auditory-visual) language understanding: older adults perform worse than younger adults, visible speech does not benefit language-processing performance, and individual differences in measures of working memory for language do not predict performance. In contrast, in a task that does not invoke inhibition: adult age differences in performance are not obtained, visible speech benefits language performance, and individual differences in working memory predict performance. The results offer support for a framework for investigating multimodal language processing that incorporates assumptions about general information processing, individual differences in working memory capacity, and adult cognitive aging.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model.Psychology and Aging, 2002
- Activation of Auditory Cortex During Silent LipreadingScience, 1997
- Exploring the Central ExecutiveThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1996
- Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location.Psychology and Aging, 1995
- Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults.Psychology and Aging, 1993
- Aging and the inhibition of spatial location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1993
- Age-related decrement in auditory selective attention.Psychology and Aging, 1990
- Aging and Cognitive DeficitsPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- Individual differences in working memory and readingJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980
- Accuracy of Recognition for Speech Presented to the Right and Left EarsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964