Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Top Cited Papers
- 3 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 137 (5_Part_1), 347-360
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00012
Abstract
Purpose: To synthesize new data on breast cancer screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry; and reference lists of reviews, editorials, and original studies. Study Selection: Eight randomized, controlled trials of mammography and 2 trials evaluating breast self-examination were included. One hundred fifty-four publications of the results of these trials, as well as selected articles about the test characteristics and harms associated with screening, were examined. Data Extraction: Predefined criteria were used to assess the quality of each study. Meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model were conducted to provide summary relative risk estimates and credible intervals (CrIs) for the effectiveness of screening with mammography in reducing death from breast cancer. Data Synthesis: For studies of fair quality or better, the summary relative risk was 0.84 (95% CrI, 0.77 to 0.91) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after approximately 14 years of observation was 1224 (CrI, 665 to 2564). Among women younger than 50 years of age, the summary relative risk associated with mammography was 0.85 (CrI, 0.73 to 0.99) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after 14 years of observation was 1792 (CrI, 764 to 10 540). For clinical breast examination and breast self-examination, evidence from randomized trials is inconclusive. Conclusions: in the randomized, controlled trials, mammography reduced breast cancer mortality rates among women 40 to 74 years of age. Greater absolute risk reduction was seen among older women. Because these results incorporate several rounds of screening, the actual number of mammograms needed to prevent one death from breast cancer is higher. In addition, each screening has associated risks and costs.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Screening Trial of Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 YearsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Screening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distressThe Breast, 2001
- US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional surveyBMJ, 2000
- Effect of False-Positive Mammograms on Interval Breast Cancer Screening in a Health Maintenance OrganizationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Effects of Estrogen and Estrogen–Progestin on Mammographic Parenchymal DensityAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- The Effect of Comorbidity on 3-Year Survival of Women with Primary Breast CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal MammogramsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined AnnuallyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- Screening for Breast CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989