Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique
Top Cited Papers
- 5 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Public Opinion Quarterly
- Vol. 74 (1), 37-67
- https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp065
Abstract
Surveys usually yield rates of voting in elections that are higher than official turnout figures, a phenomenon often attributed to intentional misrepresentation by respondents who did not vote and would be embarrassed to admit that. The experiments reported here tested the social desirability response bias hypothesis directly by implementing a technique that allowed respondents to report secretly whether they voted: the “item count technique.” The item count technique significantly reduced turnout reports in a national telephone survey relative to direct self-reports, suggesting that social desirability response bias influenced direct self-reports in that survey. But in eight national surveys of American adults conducted via the Internet, the item count technique did not significantly reduce turnout reports. This mode difference is consistent with other evidence that the Internet survey mode may be less susceptible to social desirability response bias because of self-administration.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- An experimental comparison of question forms used to reduce vote overreportingElectoral Studies, 2006
- Where does turnout decline come from?European Journal of Political Research, 2004
- A New Method of Examining Relationships between Individual Difference Measures and Sensitive Behavior Criteria: Evaluating the Unmatched Count TechniqueOrganizational Research Methods, 2004
- Overreporting VotingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2001
- Voter Turnout and the National Election StudiesPolitical Analysis, 2000
- Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source MonitoringPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1999
- Collecting "Sensitive" Data in Business Ethics Research: A Case for the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT)Journal of Business Ethics, 1997
- USING THE UNMATCHED COUNT TECHNIQUE (UCT) TO ESTIMATE BASE RATES FOR SENSITIVE BEHAVIORPersonnel Psychology, 1994
- Increasing the validity of self-reports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Response Validity: Vote ReportPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1968