Oral Capecitabine Compared With Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Large Phase III Study
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 19 (21), 4097-4106
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.21.4097
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of orally administered capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Laboratories, Inc, Nutley, NJ), a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to mimic continuous fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion but with preferential activation at the tumor site, with that of intravenous (IV) 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 602 patients to treatment with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 administered twice daily days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, or to the 4-weekly Mayo Clinic regimen (5-FU/LV) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The primary objective, to demonstrate at least equivalent response rates in the two treatment groups, was met. The overall response rate was 18.9% for capecitabine and 15.0% for 5-FU/LV. In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, respectively, median time to disease progression was 5.2 and 4.7 months (log-rank P = .65); median time to treatment failure was 4.2 and 4.0 months (log-rank P = .89); and median overall survival was 13.2 and 12.1 months (log-rank P = .33). The toxicity profiles of both treatments were typical of fluoropyrimidines. However, capecitabine led to significantly lower incidences (P < .00001) of stomatitis and alopecia, but a higher incidence of cutaneous hand-foot syndrome (P < .00001). Capecitabine also resulted in lower incidences (P < .00001) of grade 3/4 stomatitis and neutropenia, leading to a lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenic fever and sepsis. Only grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P < .00001) and uncomplicated grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia (P < .0001) were reported more frequently with capecitabine. CONCLUSION: Oral capecitabine achieved an at least equivalent efficacy compared with IV 5-FU/LV. Capecitabine demonstrated clinically meaningful safety advantages and the convenience of an oral agent.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Irinotecan plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Session F: Lymphomas – Leukemias – Myelomas – PBFCAnnals of Oncology, 2000
- Cancer statistics, 2000CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2000
- Medical resource use in a phase III trial (SO 14796) of XelodaTM (capecitabine) in previously untreated advanced/metastatic colorectal cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1999
- Global cancer statisticsCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1999
- Development of Treatment for Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Infusional 5-FU and the Role of New AgentsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1996
- A study of quality of life in cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapySocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- Chemotherapy of colorectal cancerAnti-Cancer Drugs, 1991
- A Comparison of Large-Sample Confidence Interval Methods for the Difference of Two Binomial ProbabilitiesThe American Statistician, 1986
- Comparing two independent binomial proportions by a modified chi square testBiometrical Journal, 1980