Group Comparability
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 8 (2), 247-260
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8400800206
Abstract
It is not always possible, especially in large-scale evaluation research, to ensure that random assignment will produce groups that are comparable on any number of potentially important factors. Typically, gaining comparability has been achieved only at the expense of random assignment. A method is presented that allows multivariate comparability while making only minimal restrictions on randomization. The procedure is demonstrated in the context of assigning 63 aggregated units (schools) to 28 experimental and control conditions. Good comparability of groups for all primary main effects and interactions was venfied for 15 individual variables.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of cigarette smoking in seventh grade studentsJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1980
- Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through life skills trainingPreventive Medicine, 1980
- Restricted Randomization Designs in Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1979
- Adolescent Smoking: Onset and PreventionPediatrics, 1979
- Allocation of Patients to Treatment in Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1979
- Deterring the Onset of Smoking in Children: Knowledge of Immediate Physiological Effects and Coping with Peer Pressure, Media Pressure, and Parent Modeling1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978
- Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1978
- How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social DecisionmakingIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1977
- Communication for Health: Unselling Heart DiseaseJournal of Communication, 1975
- The Scree Test For The Number Of FactorsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1966