Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Hip Arthroplasty
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (26), 2765-2775
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0800374
Abstract
This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with those of enoxaparin for extended thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 4541 patients to receive either 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban once daily, beginning after surgery, or 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously once daily, beginning the evening before surgery, plus a placebo tablet or injection. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis (either symptomatic or detected by bilateral venography if the patient was asymptomatic), nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause at 36 days (range, 30 to 42). The main secondary efficacy outcome was major venous thromboembolism (proximal deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from venous thromboembolism). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 3153 patients were included in the superiority analysis (after 1388 exclusions), and 4433 were included in the safety analysis (after 108 exclusions). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 18 of 1595 patients (1.1%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 58 of 1558 patients (3.7%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 3.7; P<0.001). Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 4 of 1686 patients (0.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 1678 patients (2.0%) in the enoxaparin group (absolute risk reduction, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5; P<0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 6 of 2209 patients (0.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 2 of 2224 patients (0.1%) in the enoxaparin group (P=0.18). A once-daily, 10-mg oral dose of rivaroxaban was significantly more effective for extended thromboprophylaxis than a once-daily, 40-mg subcutaneous dose of enoxaparin in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. The two drugs had similar safety profiles. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00329628.)Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K AntagonistsChest, 2004
- Prevention of Venous ThromboembolismChest, 2004
- Reduction of Out-of-Hospital Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism by Extended Thromboprophylaxis With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Following Elective Hip ArthroplastyArchives of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Investment in prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin improves clinical outcomes after hip replacementJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2003
- Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Total Hip ReplacementA Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin With Oral AnticoagulantArchives of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Extended Out-of-Hospital Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis against Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients after Elective Hip ArthroplastyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Extended-duration prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: a meta-analysis of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Economic Evaluation of Enoxaparin as Postdischarge Prophylaxis for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Elective Hip SurgeryValue in Health, 2000
- Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Enoxaparin) as Prophylaxis against Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip ReplacementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Risk of deep-venous thrombosis after hospital discharge in patients having undergone total hip replacement: double-blind randomised comparison of enoxaparin versus placeboThe Lancet, 1996