Solvent Effects in the Spin Trapping Of Lipid Oxyl Radicals
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Free Radical Research Communications
- Vol. 9 (3-6), 267-278
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769009145685
Abstract
Studies documenting spin trapping of lipid radicals in defined model systems have shown some surprising solvent effects with the spin trap DMPO. In aqueous reactions comparing the reduction of H2O2 and methyl linoleate hydroperoxide (MLOOH) by Fez+, hydroxyl (HO·) and lipid alkoxyl (LO·) radicals produce identical four-line spectra with line intensities 1:2:2:1. Both types of radicals react with commonly-used HO· scavengers, e.g. with ethanol to produce ·C(CH3)HOH and with dirnethylsulfoxide (DMSO)togive ·CH3. However, DMSO radicals (either ·CH3or ·OOCH3) react further with lipids, and when radicals are trapped in these MLOOH systems, multiple adducts are evident. When acetonitrile is added to the aqueous reaction systems in increasing concentrations, ·CH2CN radicals resulting from HO· attack on acetonitrile are evident, even with trace quantities of that solvent. In contrast, little, if any, reaction of LO· with acetonitrile occurs, even in 100% acetonitrile. A single four-line signal persists in the lipid systems as long as any water is present, although the relative intensity of the two center lines decreases as solvent-induced changes gradually dissociate the nitrogen and β-hydrogen splitting constants. Extraction of the aqueous-phase adducts into ethyl acetate shows clearly that the identical four-line spectra in the H202 and MLOOH systems arise from different radical species in this study, but the lack of stability of the adducts to phase transfer may limit the use of this technique for routine adduct identification in more complex systems. These results indicate that the four-line 1:2:2:1. aN = aH = 14.9G spectrum from DMPO cannot automatically be assigned to the HO· adduct in reaction systems where lipid is present, even when the expected spin adducts from ethanol or DMSO appear confirmatory for HO-. Conclusive distinction between HO· and LO· ultimately will require use of 13C-labelled DMPO or HPLC-MS separation and specific identification of adducts when DMPO is used as the spin trap.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethyl, acetate extraction of spin-trapped free radicals: A reevaluationFree Radical Biology & Medicine, 1987
- Spin Trapping: ESR parameters of spin adducts 1474 1528VFree Radical Biology & Medicine, 1987
- Studies on the photolytic breakdown of hydroperoxides and peroxidized fatty acids by using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Spin trapping of alkoxyl and peroxyl radicals in organic solventsBiochemical Journal, 1986
- Fast kinetics of the reactions of hydroxyl radicals with nitrone spin trapsJournal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 1986
- Use of spin traps in biological systemsAdvances in Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 1985
- Chemical effects of ultrasound on aqueous solutions. Formation of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen atomsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1983
- Spin trapping in electrochemistry. 2. Aqueous and nonaqueous electrochemical characterizations of spin trapsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1980
- Spin trapping of superoxide and hydroxyl radical: Practical aspectsArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1980
- A Critical Review of Spin Trapping in Biological SystemsPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- An electron spin resonance study of Fremy's salt in a dilute polycrystalline environmentThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1977