A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: wheelchair to shower chair and shower chair to wheelchair
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 34 (4), 407-419
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139108967325
Abstract
A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate five different manual techniques (two-person manual lifting; rocking and pulling the patient using a gait belt with two persons; walking belt with one and two persons) and three different mechanical hoists (Hoyer lift, Trans-Aid and Ambulift) for transferring patients from wheelchair to shower chair and shower chair to wheelchair. Six female nursing students with prior patient transfer experience served both as nurses and as passive patients. Static biomechanical evaluation showed that the mean trunk flexion moments, erector spinae muscle forces and compressive and shear forces at the L5S1 disc for the four pulling methods ranged from 92 to 125 Nm, 1845 to 2507 N, 1973 to 2641 N and 442 to 580 N, respectively, as compared to about 213 Nm, 4260 N, 5050 N and 926 N for two-person manual lifting. Perceived stress ratings for the shoulder, upper back, lower back and whole body were. significantly lower for pulling methods than those for lifting the patient (p ≤ 0·01). Patients found pulling techniques, except the gait belt, to be more comfortable and secure than the lifting method (p ≤ 0·01). However, most of the nurses believed that Medesign and the one-person walking belt would not work on those patients who cannot bear weight and those who are heavy, contracted or combative. A two-person walking belt was the most preferred method. Two out of three hoists (Hoyer lift and Trans-Aid) were perceived by the nurses to be more stressful than one- and two-person walking belts. The patients found these two hoists to be more uncomfortable and less secure than with three of the five manual methods (one- and two-person walking belts and Medesign). Pulling techniques and hoists took significantly longer amounts of time to make the transfer than manually lifting the patient (p ≤ 0·01). The two-person walking belt, using a gentle rocking motion to utilize momentum and a pulling technique, and Ambulift are recommended for transferring patients from wheelchair to shower chair and shower chair to wheelchair.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bedErgonomics, 1991
- Postural stress in geriatric nursingInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 1987
- Prediction of Overexertion Injuries Using Biomechanical and Psychophysical ModelsAihaj Journal, 1986
- Volitional Postures during Maximal Push/Pull Exertions in the Sagittal PlaneHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1983
- Hospital ward patient-lifting tasksErgonomics, 1979
- The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKSErgonomics, 1978
- The Strength of the Neural Arch and the Etiology of SpondylolysisOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1975
- Effects of Operator Stance on Pushing and Pulling TasksA I I E Transactions, 1974
- A Longitudinal Study of Low-Back Pain as Associated with Occupational Weight Lifting FactorsAihaj Journal, 1973
- The Effects of Torsion on the Lumbar Intervertebral JointsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1970