The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 46 (2), 164-169
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.46.2.164
Abstract
The aim was to compare the performance of the Dinamap 1846SX automated oscillometric blood pressure recorder with that of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer during use under field study conditions. Two independent within subject measurement comparisons were made, one in adults and one in children, each conducted in three stages over several months while the Dinamap instruments were being used in epidemiological field surveys. The studies were done in outpatients clinics (adults) and primary schools (children). 141 adults (20-85 years) and 152 children (5-7 years) took part. In adults a pair of measurements was made with each instrument, the order alternating for consecutive subjects. In children one measurements was made with each instrument, in random order. Measurements with the Dinamap 1846SX were higher than those with the random zero sphygmomanometer both in adults (mean difference 8.1 mm Hg; 95% CI 6.5 to 9.7 mm Hg) and in children (mean difference 8.3 mm Hg; 95% CI 6.9 to 9.7 mm Hg). Diastolic measurements were on average very similar both in adults and in children. The results were consistent at all three stages of both studies. The differences in systolic measurement were independent of blood pressure level. However, the extent of agreement in diastolic pressure depended on the diastolic blood pressure level; in both studies Dinamap diastolic measurements were higher at low diastolic pressures while random zero diastolic measurements were higher at high diastolic pressures. Systolic measurements made with the Dinamap 1846SX instrument are not directly comparable with those of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer and are unlikely to be comparable with those of earlier Dinamap models. These differences have important implications for clinical practice and for comparisons of blood pressure measurement between epidemiological studies. However, the consistency of measurement by the Dinamap 1846SX over time suggests that the instrument may have a place in standardised blood pressure measurement in the research setting.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blood pressure measurement in children: the importance of cuff bladder sizeJournal Of Hypertension, 1989
- Clinical evaluation of the Copal UA-251 and the Dinamap 1848 automatic blood–pressure monitorsJournal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric methodBasic Research in Cardiology, 1986
- Noninvasive determination of systolic, diastolic and end-systolic blood pressure in neonates, infants and young children: Comparison with central aortic pressure measurementsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- EVALUATION OF AN AUTOMATIC OSCILLOMETRIC METHOD AND OF VARIOUS CUFFS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL PRESSURE IN THE NEONATEActa Paediatrica, 1982
- Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: Comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurementsAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.Heart, 1980
- Experience with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1970
- ZERO-MUDDLER FOR UNPREJUDICED SPHYGMOMANOMETRYThe Lancet, 1963