Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice.
Open Access
- 1 August 1989
- Vol. 30 (8), 1132-1135
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.30.8.1132
Abstract
In patients with obstructive jaundice caused by malignant stricture of the extrahepatic bile duct we compared survival time, complication rates, hospitalisation requirements, and quality of life after palliation by endoscopic endoprosthesis or bypass surgery. During diagnostic endoscopic cholangiography 50 patients were randomised to the two treatment alternatives. All 25 patients randomised to endoprosthesis were treated by this procedure, whereas only 19 of 25 patients randomised to bypass surgery underwent operative biliary-digestive anastomosis. Life table analysis revealed no difference in survival between treatment groups or randomisation groups. No differences were found when other variables were compared. We conclude, that palliation of obstructive jaundice in malignant bile duct obstruction with endoscopically introduced endoprosthesis is as effective as operative bypass.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- RANDOMISED TRIAL OF ENDOSCOPIC VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS STENT INSERTION IN MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICEThe Lancet, 1987
- Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: Bypass surgery in unresectable diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Endoscopic palliative treatment in pancreatic cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1986
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ENDOSCOPICALLY PLACED PROSTHESES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BILIARY OBSTRUCTION DUE TO CARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS - RESULTS OF NONOPERATIVE DECOMPRESSION IN 277 PATIENTS1986
- Nonresectable malignant bile duct obstruction. Surgical bypass or endoprosthesis?1986
- PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TRANSHEPATIC BILIARY ENDOPROSTHESIS VERSUS BYPASS SURGERY FOR INCURABLE CARCINOMA OF HEAD OF PANCREASThe Lancet, 1986