Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus other antidepressants for depression
- 25 October 1999
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 4,p. CD001851
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001851
Abstract
Background The relatively new class of antidepressant, the selective serotonin reputake inhibitors (SSRIs), may be better tolerated than the older tricyclic antidepressants. This review compares the efficacy of SSRIs with other antidepressants. Objectives To examine the relative efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) compared to other antidepressants. Search methods The search strategy included a search of (a) Electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE); (b) reference lists of related reviews (c) reference lists of all located studies (d) contact with the manufacturer and (e) the Cochrane Group register of controlled trials Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with other kinds of antidepressants in the treatment of patients with depressive disorders. The outcome measures assessed included measures of the severity of depression. Data collection and analysis Data were collected from each study the main outcome measurefrom each study. These included: mean Hamilton depression rating scale, mean Montgomery & Asberg depression rating scale, Clinical Global Impression rating scale. An analysis of standardised mean difference of these scales was performed using Review Manager 3.1 software. The presence of heterogeneity of treatment effect was assessed Main results Ninety‐eight trials contributed data to the analysis of the relative efficacy of SSRIs and related drugs with comparator antidepressants (Figure 3 & Appendix 3). Analysis of efficacy was based upon 5044 patients treated with an SSRI or related drug, and 4510 treated with an alternative antidepressant. The standardised effect size for SSRIs and related drugs together versus alternative antidepressants using a fixed effects model was 0.035 (95% CI ‐0.006 to 0.076; Q = 149.25, df = 97, p < 0.001). Authors' conclusions There are no clinically significant differences in effectiveness between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Treatment decisions need to be based on considerations of relative patient acceptability, toxicity and cost.This publication has 113 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citalopram and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in general practice. A Nordic multicentre clinical studyInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1994
- A comparison of fluoxetine and imipramine in the treatment of outpatients with major depressive disorderActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1993
- A Multicentre Double Blind Trial of Fluoxetine versus Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Depressive IllnessAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- Fluoxetine versus amitriptyline in the treatment of major depressionInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1993
- Double‐blind comparative multicentre study of fluvoxamine and mianserin in the treatment of major depressive episode in elderly peopleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1991
- Response to Total Sleep Deprivation Before and During Treatment with Fluvoxamine or Maprotiline in Patients with Major Depression - Results of a Double-Blind StudyPharmacopsychiatry, 1990
- Paroxetine in the treatment of depression: a comparison with imipramine and placeboActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1989
- Citalopram versus maprotiline: A controlled, clinical multicentre trial in depressed patientsActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1987
- A double‐blind comparison of citalopram (Lu 10–171) and amitriptyline in depressed patientsActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986