Next-Generation Phage Display: Integrating and Comparing Available Molecular Tools to Enable Cost-Effective High-Throughput Analysis
Open Access
- 17 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 4 (12), e8338
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008338
Abstract
Combinatorial phage display has been used in the last 20 years in the identification of protein-ligands and protein-protein interactions, uncovering relevant molecular recognition events. Rate-limiting steps of combinatorial phage display library selection are (i) the counting of transducing units and (ii) the sequencing of the encoded displayed ligands. Here, we adapted emerging genomic technologies to minimize such challenges. We gained efficiency by applying in tandem real-time PCR for rapid quantification to enable bacteria-free phage display library screening, and added phage DNA next-generation sequencing for large-scale ligand analysis, reporting a fully integrated set of high-throughput quantitative and analytical tools. The approach is far less labor-intensive and allows rigorous quantification; for medical applications, including selections in patients, it also represents an advance for quantitative distribution analysis and ligand identification of hundreds of thousands of targeted particles from patient-derived biopsy or autopsy in a longer timeframe post library administration. Additional advantages over current methods include increased sensitivity, less variability, enhanced linearity, scalability, and accuracy at much lower cost. Sequences obtained by qPhage plus pyrosequencing were similar to a dataset produced from conventional Sanger-sequenced transducing-units (TU), with no biases due to GC content, codon usage, and amino acid or peptide frequency. These tools allow phage display selection and ligand analysis at >1,000-fold faster rate, and reduce costs ∼250-fold for generating 106 ligand sequences. Our analyses demonstrates that whereas this approach correlates with the traditional colony-counting, it is also capable of a much larger sampling, allowing a faster, less expensive, more accurate and consistent analysis of phage enrichment. Overall, qPhage plus pyrosequencing is superior to TU-counting plus Sanger sequencing and is proposed as the method of choice over a broad range of phage display applications in vitro, in cells, and in vivo.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discovery of a functional protein complex of netrin-4, laminin γ1 chain, and integrin α6β1 in mouse neural stem cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- An unrecognized extracellular function for an intracellular adapter protein released from the cytoplasm into the tumor microenvironmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Simultaneous gene expression profiling in human macrophages infected with Leishmania major parasites using SAGEBMC Genomics, 2008
- Combinatorial Targeting of the Macropinocytotic Pathway in Leukemia and Lymphoma CellsJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2008
- Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencingGenome Biology, 2007
- A quantitative view of the transcriptome of Schistosoma mansoni adult-worms using SAGEBMC Genomics, 2007
- Selection of Tumor-binding Ligands in Cancer Patients with Phage Display LibrariesCancer Research, 2006
- Quantitative PCR-based approach for rapid phage display analysis: a foundation for high throughput vascular proteomic profilingPhysiological Genomics, 2006
- Synchronous selection of homing peptides for multiple tissues byin vivophage displayThe FASEB Journal, 2006
- Combinatorial Screenings in PatientsCancer Research, 2004