Evidence for Separate Carriers for Purine Nucleosides and for Pyrimidine Nucleosides in the Renal Brush Border Membrane

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test if the transport of all nucleosides in rat renal brush border membranes occurs via a common carrier or if specific carriers exist for various groups of nucleosides. We measured the inward transport of radiolabeled nucleosides into brush border vesicles. The effect of unlabeled nucleosides present inside of the vesicles (trans-stimulation) or outside of the vesicles (cis-inhibition) was studied. Uphill influx of a nucleoside into the vesicles could be driven by the efflux of another nucleoside (trans-stimulation) if they were both purines or both pyrimidines but not if one nucleoside was a purine and the other one a pyrimidine. Thus, there exist a carrier that transports various purine nucleosides, and a carrier that transports various pyrimidine nucleosides, but the tested purine nucleosides and the tested pyrimidine nucleosides do not appear to be transported by the same carrier. Uridine and thymidine were similarly potent for the inhibition of cytidine transport whereas uridine was much more potent than thymidine for the inhibition of adenosine transport. This suggests that cytidine and adenosine can use different carriers. Preincubation of the vesicles with N-ethylmaleimide resulted in a marked decrease of the rate of transport of purine nucleosides but it had little effect on the transport of pyrimidine nucleosides. These data are best explained by the presence in the renal brush border membrane of two carriers, one for purine nucleosides, the other one for pyrimidine nucleosides. However the discrimination between purine nucleosides and pyrimidine nucleosides by the two putative carriers may not be absolute, as indicated by the finding that adenosine inhibited the transport of pyrimidine nucleosides and reciprocally.